<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slash and Weblogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meryl.net/2002/02/22/slash-and-weblogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meryl.net/2002/02/22/slash-and-weblogs/</link>
	<description>Content on writing, tech, business, marketing, social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:03:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.meryl.net/2002/02/22/slash-and-weblogs/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meryl.net/new/2002/02/22/slash-and-weblogs/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t decide if I agree with that &quot;successful weblogging&quot; article.  I mean, doesn&#039;t it depend on how you define success?  What I consider successful may not be the same as the next guy.  I may over-describe things, but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s always a bad thing.  I don&#039;t bland, understated blogs as much as I enjoy the deep, personal ones...  Just my 2 cents, I want to re-read the article before I go on further about it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t decide if I agree with that &#8220;successful weblogging&#8221; article.  I mean, doesn&#8217;t it depend on how you define success?  What I consider successful may not be the same as the next guy.  I may over-describe things, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s always a bad thing.  I don&#8217;t bland, understated blogs as much as I enjoy the deep, personal ones&#8230;  Just my 2 cents, I want to re-read the article before I go on further about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

