It’s old news to us, but Dvorak reports on The online ‘Blog’ phenomenon for PC Magazine. He thinks we do it for ego gratification, antidepersonalization, elimination of frustration, societal need to share, and wanna-be writers. Where do you fall? Me? I do it to prove him wrong that there are far fewer cat pictures. I’ve been posting a lot of cat stuff lately and I’ve never lived with a cat.

4 comments
Heh, I think I do it for every reason he mentioned and maybe a couple of more.
I found his article extremely shallow and condescending.
Obviously, Dvorak comes from the school that if you didn’t go to college to learn how to write, you can’t be a writer.
To cover the blogging phenomenon in 500 words or less, you might want to actually VISIT some blogs–which are easily found through many other places than a search engine that launches half a dozen pop-up ads when you go there. He could have started with Weblogs.com and worked from there.
I’m feeling mighty unkindly toward Dvorak right now, let me tell you.
That was kind of my point. He reported on the obvious and didn’t bother to dig any deeper. If I were a true journalist I think I would want to interview a few ‘bloggers prior to writing such an article. Basically what he did was exactly what he accuses the bulk of ‘bloggers of doing, just writing off the cuff.
Justin, I was replying to your post, but I was doing it Dvorak-style–by not reading it first.
Post a comment (or leave a trackback)