Comments on: Logo Update

By: Clarence

Clarence — Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:35:09 +0000

I prefer #2, but it’s a close call.

By: Jared Hudgins

Jared Hudgins — Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:22:39 +0000

Love # 2, the darker font makes things stand out.

By: Kevin Gascoigne

Kevin Gascoigne — Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:41:26 +0000

Hi Meryl,
They both look good. On paper I personally like No.1. If you are like me, you can analyze something like this to death..

So just pick one..!!

Cheers..

By: Sian

Sian — Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:07:36 +0000

I prefer #1.

By: Simon Jessey

Simon Jessey — Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:54:07 +0000

I like design number 1 best, although the higher contrast version may serve as a “rollover” effect later on.

I still don’t like the spacing of “Meryl.net”. How about turning the dot into a bullet dot, just like the ones you use below?

By: Nick Finck

Nick Finck — Sat, 25 Sep 2004 04:15:27 +0000

I agree that #2 stands out more, however #1 is a tighter design.. the colors sync much better with the text and the iconography/illustation. If I may make a small suggestion.. use the blue in the text of #2 but also change the baby blue in the illustration to match the darker blue.

By: mt.trushmore.pat

mt.trushmore.pat — Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:44:42 +0000

Meryl, I liked #2. It stands out - That’s what a logo is supposed to do! Grab your attention like nothing else. I’d also think anbout a brighter red (just a little. It would balance just a tad better!

By: Kevin Donahue

Kevin Donahue — Fri, 24 Sep 2004 21:35:23 +0000

I really like the lighter tone.