<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meryl.net/2005/05/css-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meryl.net/2005/05/css-site/</link>
	<description>Content on writing, tech, business, marketing, web design.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jessey</title>
		<link>http://www.meryl.net/2005/05/css-site/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jessey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 10:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meryl.net/new/2005/05/23/css-site/#comment-805</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When it started, the CSS Tableless list was great for demonstrating that it could be done - and done well. The featured sites were all opening accessibility doors, and showing the web design world that tables simply weren't needed for good design. By and large, people are now getting that message. Your site got the ball rolling, but now there are many sites that are continuing the work you started.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Much depends on how much traffic the CSS Tableless Web Site is getting. If it is still considerable, then it may be worth continuing with it a little more - especially if it is generating any kind of revenue from advertising. It may also be driving traffic to other areas of your site, raising your profile, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I remember how honored I felt when you first put me on the list (I have two sites on there, I think), but I've made many tableless sites since then that I've not bothered to submit. It feels like the message is already out there; however, as long as table-based designs outnumber their modern brethren, I suppose there will be a place for your CSS site.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it started, the CSS Tableless list was great for demonstrating that it could be done - and done well. The featured sites were all opening accessibility doors, and showing the web design world that tables simply weren&#8217;t needed for good design. By and large, people are now getting that message. Your site got the ball rolling, but now there are many sites that are continuing the work you started.</p>
<p>Much depends on how much traffic the CSS Tableless Web Site is getting. If it is still considerable, then it may be worth continuing with it a little more - especially if it is generating any kind of revenue from advertising. It may also be driving traffic to other areas of your site, raising your profile, etc.</p>
<p>I remember how honored I felt when you first put me on the list (I have two sites on there, I think), but I&#8217;ve made many tableless sites since then that I&#8217;ve not bothered to submit. It feels like the message is already out there; however, as long as table-based designs outnumber their modern brethren, I suppose there will be a place for your CSS site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
