Plagiarism Problems

Thursday, August 24th, 2006 at 8:36 AM | 2 comments Category: Meryl's Notes Blog

Hill Street BluesLet’s be careful out there!(TM) takes a creative approach in encouraging readers to avoid plagiarizing — almost the whole article, or letter, uses content from resources and attributes every single one. How can people think of stealing another person’s work even before the Internet? I suppose they thought they’d never get caught, but it isn’t the fear of getting caught that prevents me from doing such a thing — but rather doing something immoral and dishonest.

I’ve written on this topic before and wonder if perhaps some writers truly thought their ideas were original — when it was an old memory stored in the back of their minds? If you can’t connect a memory to a previously read story or article, you naturally think it’s your own imagination.

Age of Embellishment writes that Helen Keller was accused of stealing Margaret T. Canby’s work from The Frost Fairies when she wrote The Frost King. The story says Keller based it on a childhood experience. Can’t it be possible that we experience or think of a story that exists?

American Inventor, a TV show that searched for the greatest inventor, showed an inventor who learned from the judges that his product already existed. It’s not hard to believe that two people came up with an idea. In 1999, I had an idea for a baby product and in trying to build it — I couldn’t make it work. The product showed up in a catalog last year. The inventor didn’t steal my idea. Simply, we saw a problem and worked to solve it — only that person found a better answer than I did.

All this stealing words and ideas talk can make a writer paranoid as it did for Helen Keller. We simply don’t have time to research every story and idea we write to see if it already exists. All we can do is “be careful out there.” So do I attribute the quote to Hill Street Blues though I dropped the “Hey” and “let’s” since it didn’t work in my sentence?

Subscribe: RSS or E-mail

2 comments

  • Posted by: John Carter on August 26th, 2006, 3:00 PM

    I have worked through plagerism problems with at least three generations of students. I have told them all to draw from their own personal experiences as they may rely on them being unique and totally their personal possession. Generally that keeps one out of trouble. As a back-up position, every writer should own a copy of Strunk and White’s Elements of Style (1979 version) and keep it at hand.

  • Posted by: Meryl on September 1st, 2006, 7:18 AM

    From John C.

    As for Strunk and White’s Elements of Style, check out the New York Times review of the new (and current) edition as compared to previous ones–I think it was in June or July. It says it all–much more succinctly than I could. But, if I may summarize my personal biases, I prefer E. B. White’s terse, spare, and straight-forward approach to a “comic book” type of revision. You will note, too, that the revisers did not presume to add their name to the cover title. But, then, I object to the changing of the text in our church’s hymn book to make it agree with someone’s idea that all male references to God should be expunged from our music. Revisionist history is not good for anyone. Can you imagine the public outrage if current Republicans decided to revise Teddy Roosevelt’s writings to agree with their thinking? I think the old phrase was “you pays your money and you takes your choice.

Post a comment (or leave a trackback)

RSS Subscribe to be notified when new comments are added.