Link: School’s On! 2009 Edition

Friday, August 28th, 2009 at 8:26 AM | Category: Blogging, Books, Business, Links, Marketing, Meryl's Notes Blog, Tech No comments

And for fun because we’re allowed…

Tags: , ,

Links: Last Summer Weekend before School 2009 Edition

Friday, August 21st, 2009 at 7:11 AM | Category: Blogging, Language, Links, Marketing, Meryl's Notes Blog, Tech, Writing 2 comments

Yeah!!! Did that sound too happy? I think summer would be more valuable if we stretched out the school year and have two to three week breaks at a time. Then, older kids would miss out the opportunity of having summer jobs or doing special programs. Eh, it’ll never change.

And for fun because we’re allowed…

Tags: , , ,

8 Ways to Kiss up to the Media

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009 at 8:59 AM | Category: Business, Marketing, Meryl's Notes Blog 2 comments

The popularity of Peter Shankman’s Help a Reporter Out (affectionately known as HARO) proves many of you, your company or clients want to get in the spotlight. Occasionally, Peter kicks folks off the list because they can’t follow one simple rule:

By joining this list, just promise me and yourself that you’ll ask yourself before you send a response: Is this response really on target? Is this response really going to help the journalist, or is this just a BS way for me to get my client in front of the reporter? If you have to think for more than three seconds, chances are, you shouldn’t send the response.

I use the mailing list from both sides: as a journalist and as an expert. Thank goodness I am a journalist because it helps me do better on the other side of things. I often put in my requests to use “HARO Subject” in Subject. You’d be surprised how many fail to do that. Based on this, it’s no wonder people disobey Peter’s numero uno rule. Furthermore, people embarrass themselves by sending a press release (PR) to media that have nothing to do with that industry, topic or anything. OK, I admit — sometimes we reporters don’t make ourselves clear (me, too).

So what are these simple, common sense rules that too many fail to follow? My top 8:

  1. Read the publication: Businesses and PR pros send me PR regarding video and audio apps. It doesn’t take much to figure out I don’t do video or audio unless it has captions.
  2. Contact the right reporter: You’re not going to send a company’s new computer product story to the sports reporter unless it’s about sports statistics.
  3. Copy the column style: Many publications have regular columns and features based on businesses and people. When submitting for these regulars, copy the style to improve your chances of getting in.
  4. Provide story ideas: Rather than tooting your company’s latest award (whoopee dee do), help the reporter by offering story ideas. Awards are best left on the company’s site and distributed in online PR sites rather than sent to reporters. I’m sure there are a few exceptions.
  5. Share trends: Noticing a trend in your industry or business that few know about yet? Help the reporter jump on it (remember to contact the right publication and the right reporter so it doesn’t go to waste).
  6. Select a few publications: Rather than trying to befriend everyone — pick a handful of publications and build those relationships. Simply contact the reporter to introduce yourself and ask if he/she is working on anything and needs resources.
  7. Follow the reporter’s request to a tee: I often provide what I need from folks, yet some people respond with the “John Doe is an author of such-n-such and speaks on this topics. Call me to set up an interview.” Hello? The questions are right there — answer ‘em or kiss the opportunity good-bye.
  8. Respect the reporter’s preferred communication method: I always put “No phone calls” in my requests. However, I know that some think it applies to the initial contact and that I’ll call ‘em. When it’s in my control, I skip the calls. If your expert doesn’t have time to email, I know others who do.

Bonus points: Research the reporter before making contact. Here’s a challenge. What can you find out about me? Both personal and professional?

My favorite story: I received a book about adopting cats to review. The only time I’ve ever mentioned cats was a few years ago when there was a internet cat joke floating around. I’m a dog person and I don’t review books about animals unless the title just happens to have an animal in the name such as Waiting for Your Cat to Bark? (it’s NOT about cats!).

If you have a product or book, you can send it to the publication, blogger or web site. But contacting them first ensures a better chance of seeing the item get reviewed. Besides, why waste a copy of Taking Care of Your Adopted Cat on me? I just donate it and hope someone can use it.

FYI: I don’t make a big deal out of those who can’t follow the simple “Subject” instructions — just giving you an example of something that’s easy to follow.

What other ways do you build your relationship with the media and get publicity?

Tags: , ,

Better About Pages

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008 at 7:57 AM | Category: Business, Customer Service, Meryl's Notes Blog, Tech No comments

Jakob Nielsen reports seeing a 9 percent improvement on company About pages. I rely on About pages when looking at companies either for research or for buying from them. I still run into the following problems:

  • Struggle to find the About pages when they have one: they shouldn’t be buried or hard to find. “About” deserves top level navigation because it’s about earning trust and credibility. I shouldn’t have to use the search box to find them.
  • Receive little valuable information: many companies provide only an overview that tells nothing about the company and what it does: sometimes it sounds like the company posts its useless vision or mission statement, which rarely makes sense to most of us (and sometimes employees, too!).
  • Find no information about employees or executives. It helps to have some bios on the site along with photos. This puts a human face behind the company.

When looking at About pages, I expect to find the following (at a minimum):

  • Instant understanding of what the company does. I shouldn’t have to read the whole page to figure out the company’s business. Unfortunately, this is common. The home page should also make it obvious what the company does.
  • Contact information: Some companies put this on a Contact page, but it should also appear on the About page. Depending on the business, it also helps to have contact information on every page — it could be a toll free number for businesses selling products or an address for stores.
  • Bios and photos: Again, people make the company and it adds credibility. I’ve seen too many sites selling products without bios — which doesn’t give me much comfort in shopping with them. Whose bio should appear depends on the company. Small companies might list all employees while large companies list the CEO and vice presidents.

Other useful About content (not all of these would appear on the About landing page), but not a requirement of all companies:

  • Fact sheet: Basic information about the company including when founded, milestones, key bios. Sometimes referred as company backgrounder.
  • Press page: This contains press contact’s information, media kit, list of press releases (linking to the full release), list articles appearing in (with links to full article or a file containing the article), photos, and logos.
  • Company history: Where the company came from and where it is heading.
  • Investor information: Provides the information investors want to see such as financial reports.

What other things do you look for when researching a company or considering doing business with them?

Tags: , ,

Plotting the Death of PR Phone Calls

Tuesday, December 4th, 2007 at 8:25 AM | Category: Business, Marketing, Meryl's Notes Blog, Writing No comments

Reporters everywhere despise it when PR people call them and ask, “Did you get my [fill in the blank]?” Fill in the blank with your distribution preference: “e-mail, fax, or other means of distribution.”

We know e-mail can get lost somewhere on the Internet highway, but that doesn’t justify calling a busy reporter or editor with such a silly question. The Washington Post [Link: Publicity Hound] pokes fun at this frustrating practice.

One of my current projects involves contacting writers and editors of the appropriate publication (a mistake many PR people make… sending it to publications that have nothing to do with their release or business — or at least, they don’t make a connection).

Based on experience as a person on both the sending and receiving end of PRs, I think what’s most effective is a note personalized to the recipient and publication that focuses on what readers could get out of a story and proposing story ideas.

Some publications accept articles from companies (IF they’re not marketing-speak) — take advantage and propose story ideas that complement the publication and avoid topics that have already appeared in the publication unless it’s reporting something new or different. Using this method, two publication responded to my e-mail and we’re working on something.

At the end of the message, let the recipient know there’s a PR WITHIN the e-mail for FYI. Don’t make the message about the PR. Writing creative PRs works — but some clients prefer sticking with traditional PRs. Focus time and energy on that personalized intro.

Tags: , ,

Subscribe to this here blog: RSS or E-mail


Get Updates